It’s not as though dozens of bowl teams won’t be motivated.
Yes, you’ll get the occasional “sulking bowl team” such as USC in the 2012 Sun Bowl against Georgia Tech, but in most cases, the “motivation factor” manifests itself in the form of the underdog that really, really wants to prove a point or make a memory.
A perfect example of this is the 2014 Sun Bowl — aka, the “Devil Bowl” — between Arizona State and Duke. The Devils of Sun will want to cleanse the palate with a postseason win after getting outplayed by Arizona, and also after dragging listlessly through the 2013 Holiday Bowl in a loss to Texas Tech. The Devils of Blue, however, will be 1,000 times more motivated than ASU to win in El Paso. Why? Duke hasn’t won a bowl in 53 years. If Duke wins, don’t trot out the “ASU wasn’t motivated” line. Trot out the better “Duke was extra motivated” argument.
How does this dynamic apply to the 36 non-playoff bowls? How many games exist in which the result means a lot more to one team than the other? How many games exist in which the result means roughly as much to either team?
Let’s tally up the numbers for these 36 games, shall we?
*
TWO-WAY GAMES: THE BOWL MEANS ROUGHLY THE SAME TO EACH TEAM
The 21 games which fit this description:
1. Colorado State-Utah (Las Vegas)
2. Western Michigan-Air Force (Potato) — Both teams have won seven more games this season than last season. It’s a big game, but it will mean the same to each squad.
3. BYU-Memphis (Miami Beach) — BYU is used to bowling, and Memphis isn’t, but BYU wants to be able to move up in the college football power structure, so this bowl means something to the Cougars, not just the Tigers.
4. Northern Illinois-Marshall (Boca Raton)
5. San Diego State-Navy (Poinsettia)
6. Central Michigan-Western Kentucky (Bahamas) — Both teams will be immensely excited to play in a bowl, and to do so in The Bahamas.
7. Fresno State-Rice (Hawaii)
8. Illinois-Louisiana Tech (Heart of Dallas) — These teams come from very different places on the college football map, but for their own reasons, this game will have an equally powerful pull for both.
9. Rutgers-North Carolina (Quick Lane) — This game serves as a reminder that “equal levels of meaning” doesn’t necessarily mean “both teams will be thrilled beyond measure to play in this specific game against this specific opponent.” In other words, “equal meaning” doesn’t automatically translate to “a sky-high level of meaning.”
10. North Carolina State-UCF (St. Petersburg)
11. Virginia Tech-Cincinnati (Military)
12. Penn State-Boston College (Pinstripe) — Penn State is just happy to be able to go to a bowl game, so in a certain sense, you could say this is a “one-way” bowl and not a two-way bowl. However, these teams share the Northeast as a recruiting battleground, and that’s the component which makes this more of a two-way game.
13. West Virginia-Texas A&M (Liberty)
14. Notre Dame-LSU (Music City)
15. Louisville-Georgia (Belk) — Both teams badly want to win the Todd Grantham Bowl, a battleground game in the constant tug of war between the ACC and SEC.
16. Minnesota-Missouri (Citrus)
17. Michigan State-Baylor (Cotton)
18. Pittsburgh-Houston (Armed Forces)
19. Kansas State-UCLA (Alamo)
20. Toledo-Arkansas State (GoDaddy)
21. Georgia Tech-Mississippi State (Orange) — Another (and much bigger) ACC-SEC clash, with the result having a lot to say about the balance of power between these conferences.
*
ONE-WAY GAMES: THE BOWL MEANS A LOT MORE TO ONE TEAM THAN THE OTHER
The 15 games which fit this description:
1. Nevada-ULL (New Orleans) — ULL has played in this game the past three years. It’s the first bowl for Brian Polian as Nevada’s coach. A ULL loss won’t be a negatively transformative event for the Ragin’ Cajuns.
2. Utah State-UTEP (New Mexico) — Utah State expects to play in bowl games these days. UTEP couldn’t have known before this season that it was going to go bowling. This kind of dynamic will exist in a few other bowls on this list.
3. Bowling Green-South Alabama (Camellia) — Bowling Green will care about this contest. South Alabama will be jumping out of its shoes, playing in its first-ever bowl game. There’s a real difference in how the two teams will treat this game, with the proper point of emphasis being that South Alabama will care more, not that Bowling Green will somehow care less.
4. Arizona State-Duke (Sun)
5. Miami-South Carolina (Independence) — Steve Spurrier would really like to win this game, but Al Golden NEEDS to win this game.
*
6. Nebraska-USC (Holiday) — Nebraska’s in the midst of a coaching change. USC needs to see more from Steve Sarkisian. These teams occupy very different pieces of terrain in this game. It’s essential for USC to win, not as much for Nebraska.
7. Clemson-Oklahoma (Russell Athletic) — No Deshaun Watson for Clemson means that OU has all the expectations, Clemson none of the pressure. It’s gravy for Clemson if it wins, a disaster for OU if it loses. That’s the “heads I win, tails you lose” nature of some bowl games in a nutshell.
8. Texas-Arkansas (Texas) — Texas would love to win. Arkansas HAS to win to validate all the late-season hype it received.
9. Maryland-Stanford (Foster Farms)
10. Wisconsin-Auburn (Outback) — If Wisconsin wasn’t dealing with a coaching change, this would have been a two-way game, and a fascinating one. As it is, though, the Badgers can’t be penalized or knocked too much if they lose under these adjusted circumstances.
*
11. Iowa-Tennessee (TaxSlayer)
12. Oklahoma State-Washington (Cactus)
13. Florida-East Carolina (Birmingham)
14. Ole Miss-TCU (Peach) — TCU-Mississippi State or Ole Miss-Michigan State would have been two-way games. This is more a one-way game in which all the expectations and pressure fall on the Horned Frogs.
15. Boise State-Arizona (Fiesta) — One team is hoping for a huge upset. The other team expects to win. This game means a ton to Arizona… it means 10 tons to Boise State. Had Arizona drawn, for the sake of argument, Baylor or Michigan State in its bowl game, you’d have encountered a “two-way” bowl.