Action in the Midwest Region begins tonight with the 16 seed play-in game between Hampton and Manhattan. The winner of that game has the unenviable task of being Kentucky’s only guaranteed victim of March. If Kentucky was the 1 seed that was upset by the 16 seed, it would be the greatest upset in the history of college basketball. We would have to retire the word ‘upset’ after such an occassion.
The Wildcats’ path doesn’t seem riddled with teams that are clearly threatening. There are some good teams of course, just none that seem to match up with the powerhouse.
There are great stories in this region. You have five Indiana teams that could end up meeting and give us a slew of stories in the process. One of the trendy picks is Wichita State battling Kansas in the round of 32. That’s a game Kansas does not care about playing; Wichita State, on the other hand, very much does. You have West Virginia and Kentucky potentially meeting in the Sweet 16 with the historical footnote of West Virginia knocking the 2010 Kentucky team out of the tournament. You have a potential Kansas-Kentucky rematch. You have a potential Cincinnati-versus-Bob Huggins game waiting in the Sweet 16. (If the world blows up.)
You also have the Texas Longhorns as the 11 seed. A lot has been said about whether or not Texas should have made the tournament. Now that the Horns are in a single-elimination situation, they are going to be picked over Butler on talent alone by some. Texas is currently favored in Vegas, too. This is one of the weird things about the tournament: People have been railing against Texas for weeks, saying that it had its chances against the RPI top 50 and blew almost all of them. Yet, the Horns are playing another RPI top 50 team in Butler, and many are picking them to win.
Before we get to know the teams, let’s get to know the statistical leaders. Let’s use the common stats: points, field goals made, free throws made, free throw percentage, 3-pointers made, 3-point percentage, rebounds, offensive rebounds, assists, steals and blocks. There will be a top 25 for scorers and the rest will be top 15.
http://gty.im/163639417
Points
- 17.7 – Justin Moss, Buffalo
- 16.8 – Jerian Grant, Notre Dame
- 16.7 – Alec Peters, Valparaiso
- 16.6 – Kellen Dunham, Butler
- 16.5 – Emmy Andujar, Manhattan
- 16.3 – Melo Trimble, Maryland
- 16.1 – Yogi Ferrell, Indiana
- 15.7 – James Blackmon Jr, Indiana
- 15.4 – Dez Wells, Maryland
- 15.4 – Shannon Evans, Buffalo
- 15 – Ron Baker, Wichita State
- 14.5 – Juwan Staten, West Virginia
- 14.5 – Scott Eatherton, Northeastern
- 13.8 – Perry Ellis, Kansas
- 13.5 – Ashton Pankey, Manhattan
- 13.3 – David Walker, Northeastern
- 13.3 – Remi Barry, New Mexico State
- 13.1 – Troy Williams, Indiana
- 13.1 – Shane Richard, Manhattan
- 13 – Isaiah Taylor, Texas
- 13 – Pascal Siakam, New Mexico State
- 13 – Dwight Meikle, Hampton
- 12.8 – Pat Connaughton, Notre Dame
- 12.8 – Jake Layman, Maryland
25. 12.7 – Fred Van Vleet, Wichita State
Field Goals
- 200 – Justin Moss, Buffalo
- 190 – Scott Eatherton, Northeastern
- 189 – Alec Peters, Valparaiso
- 187 – Emmy Andujar, Manhattan
- 185 – Jerian Grant, Notre Dame
- 171 – Yogi Ferrell, Indiana
- 173 – James Blackmon Jr, Indiana
- 164 – Kellen Dunham, Butler
- 164 – Pascal Siakam, New Mexico State
- 162 – Zach Auguste, Notre Dame
- 161 – Ron Baker, Wichita State
- 159 – Troy Williams, Indiana
- 158 – Perry Ellis, Kansas
- 158 – Shannon Evans, Buffalo
- 156 – Roosevelt Jones, Butler
Free Throws Made
- 199 – Melo Trimble, Maryland
- 166 – Justin Moss, Buffalo
- 154 – Jerian Grant, Notre Dame
- 148 – Ashton Pankey, Manhattan
- 134 – Emmy Andujar, Mahattan
- 132 – Kellen Dunham, Butler
- 121 – Devin Williams, West Virginia
- 115 – David Walker, Northeastern
- 113 – Shannon Evans, Buffalo
- 111 – Juwan Staten, West Virginia
- 110 – Perry Ellis, Kansas
- 110 – Fred Van Vleet, Wichita State
- 107 – Scott Eatherton, Northeastern
- 105 – Yogi Ferrell, Indiana
- 104 – Frank Marson III, Kansas
Free Throw % – minimum 40 attempts
- 91.7 – Brannen Greene, Kansas
- 86.5 – Melo Trimble, Maryland
- 86.5 – David Walker, Northeastern
- 85.7 – Kellen Dunham, Butler
- 85.4 – Yogi Ferrell, Indiana
- 84.9 – Steve Vasturia, Notre Dame
- 84.9 – Deron Powers, Hampton
- 84.1 – Alec Peters, Valparaiso
- 84 – Myles Turner, Texas
- 84 – Brian Darden, Hampton
- 83.8 – Isaiah Taylor, Texas
- 82.8 – Devin Booker, Kentucky
- 82.5 – Alex Barlow, Butler
- 81.9 – Shane Richards, Manhattan
- 81.4 – Karl-Anthony Towns, Kentucky
T-15. 81.4 – James Blackmon Jr, Indiana
3-Pointers Made
- 88 – Pat Connaughton, Notre Dame
- 88 – Shane Richards, Manhattan
- 79 – Alec Peters, Valparaiso
- 78 – Yogi Ferrell, Indiana
- 76 – Ron Baker, Wichita State
- 75 – James Blackmon Jr, Indiana
- 73 – Kellen Dunham, Butler
- 72 – Kendall Stephens, Purdue
- 67 – David Walker, Northeastern
- 66 – Brian Darden, Hampton
- 63 – Shannon Evans, Buffalo
- 62 – Nick Zeisloft, Indiana
- 61 – Jarryn Skeete, Buffalo
- 58 – Ian Baker, New Mexico State
- 56 – Melo Trimble, Maryland
T-15. 56 – Alex Barlow, Butler
3-Point % – minimum 40 attempts
- 55.1 – Caleb Donnelly, Northeastern
- 50 – Dez Wells, Maryland
- 47.3 – Demarcus Holland, Texas
- 47.2 – Ian Baker, New Mexico State
- 46.2 – Alec Peters, Valparaiso
- 45.6 – Collin Hartman, Indiana
- 45.3 – Nick Zeisloft, Indiana
- 44.6 – Remi Barry, New Mexico State
- 43.6 – Pat Connaughton, Notre Dame
- 43.1 – Troy Caupain, Cincinnati
- 42.9 – Devin Booker, Kentucky
- 42.4 – VJ Beachem, Notre Dame
- 41.9 – RaSwan Stores, Manhattan
- 41.8 – Tyler Ulis, Kentucky
15. 41.5 – Kellen Dunham, Butler
Rebounds
- 313 – Kameron Woods, Butler
- 295 – Justin Moss, Buffalo
- 254 – Pascal Siakam, New Mexico State
- 253 – Pat Connaughton, Notre Dame
- 253 – Devin Wiliams, West Virginia
- 235 – Emmy Andujar, Manhattan
- 232 – Octavius Ellis, Cincinnati
- 227 – Karl-Anthony Towns, Kentucky
- 226 – Troy Williams, Indiana
- 225 – Gary Clark, Cincinnati
- 224 – Perry Ellis, Kansas
- 223 – Alec Peters, Buffalo
- 219 – Willie Cauley-Stein, Kentucky
- 217 – Dwight Meikle, Hampton
- 216 – AJ Hammons, Purdue
- 216 – Scott Eatherton, Northeastern
Offensive Rebounds
- 109 – Pascal Siakam, New Mexico State
- 96 – Kameron Woods, Butler
- 95 – Jonathan Holton, West Virginia
- 91 – Justin Moss, Buffalo
- 87 – Devin Williams, West Virginia
- 86 – Octavius Ellis, Cincinnati
- 85 – Emmy Andujar, Manhattan
- 84 – Gary Clark, Cincinnati
- 81 – Karl-Anthony Towns, Kentucky
- 77 – AJ Hammons, Purdue
- 77 – Willie Cauley-Stein, Kentucky
- 76 – Vashil Fernandez, Valparaiso
- 74 – Cameron Ridley, Texas
- 74 -Xavier Ford, Buffalo
T-14. 74 – Ashton Pankey, Manhattan
Assists
- 226 – Jerian Grant, Notre Dame
- 170 – Fred Van Vleet, Wichita State
- 163 – Yogi Ferrell, Indiana
- 150 – Shannon Evans, Buffalo
- 138 – Lamonte Bearden, Buffalo
- 137 – Frank Mason, Kansas
- 126 – Andrew Harrison, Kentucky
- 125 – Juwan Staten, West Virginia
- 120 – Tyler Ulis, Kentucky
- 119 – David Walker, Northeastern
- 119 – Deron Powers, Hampton
- 118 – Roosevelt Jones, Butler
- 113 – Troy Caupain, Cincinnati
- 110 – TJ Williams, Northeastern
- 110 – Emmy Andujar, Manhattan
Turnovers
- 125 – Emmy Andujar, Manhattan
- 85 – Roosevelt Jones, Butler
- 82 – Shannon Evans, Buffalo
- 81 – Melo Trimble, Maryland
- 80 – Dez Wells, Maryland
- 79 – Dwight Meikle, Hampton
- 76 – Zach Stahl, Northeastern
- 74 – TJ Williams, Northeastern
- 74 – David Walker, Northeastern
- 73 – Jerian Grant, Notre Dame
- 73 – Ashton Pankey, Manhattan
- 72 – Justin Moss, Buffalo
- 72 – Ian Baker, New Mexico State
- 71 – AJ Hammons, Purdue
T-14. 71 – Quincy Ford, Northeastern
Steals
- 70 – Alex Barlow, Butler
- 65 – Emmy Andujar, Manhattan
- 59 – Jevon Carter, West Virginia
- 58 – Fred Van Vleet, Wichita State
- 57 – Jerian Grant, Notre Dame
- 56 – Demetrius Jackson, Notre Dame
- 55 – Shannon Evans, Buffalo
- 48 – Frank Mason, Kansas
- 47 – Ian Baker, New Mexico State
- 45 – Ke’Ron Brown, Hampton
- 44 – Willie Cauley-Stein, Kentucky
- 44 – Lamonte Bearden, Buffalo
- 43 – Tyler Wilson, Manhattan
- 42 – Aaron Harrison, Kentucky
T-14. 42 – Daniel Mullings, New Mexico State
Blocks
- 98 – Vashil Fernandez, Valparaiso
- 95 – AJ Hammons, Purdue
- 88 – Myles Turner, Texas
- 80 – Karl-Anthony Towns, Kentucky
- 66 – Octavius Ellis, Cincinnati
- 59 – Pascal Siakam, New Mexico State
- 57 – Cameron Ridley, Texas
- 56 – Willie Cauley-Stein, Kentucky
- 47 – Prince Ibeh, Texas
- 46 – Ashton Pankey, Manhattan
- 43 – Damonte Dobb, Maryland
- 43 – Scott Eatherton, Northeastern
- 43 – Dwight Meikle, Hampton
- 41- Gary Clark, Cincinnati
- 41 – Jervon Pressley, Hampton
http://gty.im/465211828
How They Got Here
1) Kentucky Wildcats – SEC Tournament champions
2) Kansas Jayhawks – At large
3) Notre Dame Fighting Irish – ACC Tournament champions
4) Maryland Terrapins – At large
5) West Virginia Mountaineers – At large
6) Butler Bulldogs – At large
7) Wichita State Shockers – At large
8) Cincinnati Bearcats – At large
9) Purdue Boilermakers – At large
10) Indiana Hoosiers – At large
11) Texas Longhorns – At large
12) Buffalo Bulls – MAC Tournament champions
13) Valparaiso Crusaders – Horizon Tournament champions
14) Northeastern Huskies – CAA Tournament champions
15) New Mexico State Aggies – WAC Tournament champions
16) Manhattan Jaspers – MAAC Tournament champions
16) Hampton Pirates – MEAC Tournament champions
http://gty.im/462725674
The Favorite – Kentucky Wildcats
The top overall seed is a gigantic favorite to win the region. There is one bracket where no other team has higher than 9 percent odds to come out of the bracket, this one. Cincinnati and Purdue have under 10 percent odds to beat Kentucky in the second round COMBINED. That’s how heavy a favorite the Wildcats are. No other team is above 82% to reach the Sweet 16.
It helps that the Wildcats got a very fortunate path. Maryland and West Virginia are each being talked about having a chance at being upset in the first round. When those are the two best teams you’ll face before the Elite 8, that’s not a bad road.
There’s also the fact that Kentucky went undefeated during the regular season and is really damn good.
http://gty.im/464888030
Elite 8 Sleeper – Wichita State
The Shockers look a little underseeded considering that a lot of the metrics had them as a top 20 team. It’s not often you see a 7 seed with the fourth best odds to make it out of their region. In fact, Wichita State is the only one. A potential second-round game with Kansas in Omaha would be a hell of a lot of fun. A potential Sweet 16 game with Notre Dame would have the looks of a great guard-dominated contest. Plus, the story of Wichita State trying to knock undefeated Kentucky out of the tournament a year after Kentucky knocked an undefeated Wichita State team out of the tournament is so good.
Also, Ron Baker and Fred Van Vleet are really great and you are going to have to kill them like Dracula to knock out the Shockers.
http://gty.im/466004710
Upset Everyone is Picking – Texas over Butler
The Longhorns have so many big bodies to throw at the Bulldogs. Kameron Woods is good, but he’s all Butler really has inside. Myles Turner, Cameron Ridley and company could and should dominate. Not playing Big 12 teams should be a help to Texas as well.
I would be wary of picking Texas just because the Longhorns have looked really strong but have dropped every close game as of late. They played well at Kansas but lost. UT was crushing Iowa State but then collapsed and lost. Butler is a team that’s going to bring it for all 40 minutes. Will Texas wilt?
http://gty.im/466421010
Can Notre Dame Make it Out of the First Weekend?
Notre Dame’s gigantic knock is that Mike Brey has not had tournament success. The Irish haven’t made it out of the first weekend since 2003. That’s also the only time ND has made it to the Sweet 16 since 1987. Notre Dame is 2-6 in its last six trips. This certainly looks like the best Irish team to make a run in years. While I personally think ND will make a run, I do wonder if the Irish will get a little tight in a close second-round game.
http://gty.im/464179470
What are the most and least likely tournament games among the 5 Indiana schools?
- Notre Dame vs Butler – Round of 32
- Notre Dame vs Indiana – Sweet 16
- Butler vs Indiana – Sweet 16
- Notre Dame vs Purdue – Elite 8
- Butler vs Purdue – Elite 8
- Indiana vs Purdue – Elite 8
- Purdue vs Valpo – Sweet 16
- Notre Dame vs Valpo – Elite 8
- Butler vs Valpo – Elite 8
- Indiana vs Valpo – Elite 8
Is there a case for anyone besides Kentucky?
http://gty.im/462814172
Not really. When every caveat to beating a team is that it has to play the worst game of the season and you play your best, that’s not really much of a case. The best case would be Notre Dame, someone that could hit a lot of threes and have a great offensive showing. The Irish have a deficient defense that would probably be taken advantage of, however. Kansas has already been destroyed by Kentucky. The other teams, besides Texas, don’t really have the talent to match up.
How do the teams stack up in terms of efficiency?
Glad you asked. To not overwhelm you with stats, here are the key efficiency stats: offense, defense, effective field goal percentage (weighs 3s), turnovers, and offensive rebounding percentage.
Offensive Efficiency
- 122.2 – Notre Dame
- 119.7 – Kentucky
- 116.6 – Indiana
- 113 – Wichita St
- 111.2 – West Virginia
- 110.8 – Kansas
- 110.3 – Texas
- 109.8 – Buffalo
- 108.5 – Maryland
- 108.5 – Purdue
- 107.5 – Butler
- 106.7 – Cincinnati
- 106 – Northeastern
- 104.1 – New Mexico St
- 103.8 – Valparaiso
- 100.9 – Manhattan
- 95.6 – Hampton
eFG %
- 58.6 – Notre Dame
- 54.6 – Indiana
- 54.6 – Northeastern
- 51.8 – Kentucky
- 51.4 – Valparaiso
- 51 – New Mexico St
- 50.9 – Maryland
- 50.7 – Purdue
- 50.7 – Wichita St
- 50.4 – Cincinnati
- 49.7 – Manhattan
- 49.4 – Texas
- 49.3 – Kansas
- 49.1 – Butler
- 48.6 – Buffalo
- 46.6 – West Virginia
- 45.8 – Hampton
Turnover %
- 14.4 – Notre Dame
- 15.2 – Wichita St
- 16.4 – Buffalo
- 16.4 – Kentucky
- 17.1 – Indiana
- 17.4 – Butler
- 18.4 – Maryland
- 18.7 – West Virginia
- 19.1 – Kansas
- 19.1 – Valparaiso
- 20 – Purdue
- 20 – Texas
- 20.5 – Hampton
- 21 – Manhattan
- 21.3 – Cincinnati
- 21.4 – Northeastern
- 21.9 – New Mexico St
Offensive Rebounding %
- 40.9 – West Virginia
- 40.4 – Kentucky
- 39.5 – New Mexico St
- 38 – Texas
- 37.3 – Cincinnati
- 36.2 – Purdue
- 35.5 – Butler
- 35.3 – Indiana
- 35 – Valparaiso
- 34.9 – Kansas
- 34.8 – Wichita St
- 34.7 – Buffalo
- 32.8 – Hampton
- 31 – Manhattan
- 29.6 – Northeastern
- 29.2 – Maryland
- 28.1 – Notre Dame
Defensive Efficiency
- 85.8 – Kentucky
- 90.5 – Kansas
- 91.7 – Butler
- 92.9 – Wichita St
- 93.3 – Cincinnati
- 93.3 – Texas
- 94.3 – Valparaiso
- 94.6 – Maryland
- 95.4 – West Virginia
- 97.1 – Purdue
- 97.6 – New Mexico St
- 98.5 – Buffalo
- 99.5 – Manhattan
- 99.7 – Notre Dame
- 102.3 – Hampton
- 102.4 – Northeastern
- 104.7 – Indiana
eFG%
- 39.7 – Kentucky
- 42.2 – Texas
- 44.4 – Kansas
- 44.5 – Cincinnati
- 44.9 – Valparaiso
- 45.2 – Wichita St
- 45.4 – Maryland
- 45.5 – Purdue
- 45.9 – New Mexico St
- 46.5 – Hampton
- 46.9 – Butler
- 48 – Manhattan
- 48.1 – Notre Dame
- 48.5 – Buffalo
- 49.6 – Northeastern
- 50.5 – Indiana
- 52.6 – West Virginia
Turnover %
- 28.2 – West Virginia
- 24.1 – Manhattan
- 21.8 – Kentucky
- 21.6 – Wichita St
- 20.5 – New Mexico St
- 20.3 – Cincinnati
- 20.1 – Hampton
- 19.8 – Buffalo
- 19.3 – Butler
- 18.6 – Valparaiso
- 17.8 – Purdue
- 17.5 – Kansas
- 17.3 – Maryland
- 17.4 – Notre Dame
- 16.1 – Indiana
- 15.6 – Northeastern
- 14.2 – Texas
Offensive Rebounding %
- 24.9 – Butler
- 25.6 – Northeastern
- 27 – Wichita St
- 27.6 – Valparaiso
- 29 – Texas
- 30.4 – Maryland
- 30.4 – Buffalo
- 30.7 – New Mexico St
- 30.9 – Hampton
- 31.1 – West Virginia
- 31.1 – Purdue
- 31.2 – Indiana
- 31.6 – Notre Dame
- 31.6 – Kentucky
- 31.8 – Cincinnati
- 31.8 – Kansas
- 33.7 – Manhattan