2015 NCAA Tournament Preview: South Region

The South Region of the NCAA Tournament bracket is one that has drawn the most scoffs. Duke was comfortably a number 1 seed, even though they were not the ACC regular season or tournament champions. On top of that, they were placed in a region with the weakest 4 seed in Georgetown and a 5 seed many think is an upset risk with Utah. Duke finished out of the top 5 in the (outdated) RPI and are currently 7th on Ken Pom. The Blue Devils aren’t even considered the Ken Pom projection favorite.

With all of that being said, there is almost no one like Duke when the Blue Devils are rolling. They look like the best chance someone has at beating Kentucky. They look like the best team in the nation period at times. With Jahlil Okafor able to do whatever he wants in the middle, it opens the floor for Duke’s guards. Tyus Jones has taken over games late, Quinn Cook is a dead eye shooter, Justise Winslow adds a bit of it all. There is the dark side to this squad, namely on defense. If you watched Notre Dame dissect them in the ACC tournament, you know exactly what I’m talking about.

If Duke isn’t the computer favorite, who is? The answer are the Gonzaga Bulldogs. This is the most balanced team Mark Few has ever coached. A Gonzaga team that plays defense is something we haven’t really seen in recent years. All the hype surround the offense, which it should because the offense is great. Gonzaga shoots the ball just about as well as anyone. We could have a tremendous game if the Bulldogs meet up with Iowa State in the Sweet 16.

The Cyclones are an interesting bunch. They are team dramatic. There isn’t a game that goes by that doesn’t see them fall into a hole. Most of the time, Iowa State comes flying out of it with a chainsaw on their arm like Ash and use it to rip the other team apart with a huge run. There can’t be another team that is scarier when your favorite teams is up 15 points.

Georgetown is seemingly given no shot at advancing deep in the tournament. They were overseeded, which is not their fault. The Hoyas run of NCAA tournament futility since the 2007 Final Four is noted by everyone. The last five times they have made the tournament, Georgetown has lost to a double digit seed. There is a chance they could play two of them this weekend.

If any other team closed as uninspiring as Utah did, I would not pick them to go far. The Utes scuffled badly to a 5-5 record to close the regular season with some bad performances. The only bad loss was at Washington. Utah lost to Oregon twice and Arizona as well, but didn’t look good in wins at Oregon State or Washington State. The second half domination of Stanford gives some hope that his team can get back to what they were a month ago. There is a question of if they peaked too soon.

http://gty.im/463467232

 

How They Got Here

1) Duke Blue Devils – At large

2) Gonzaga Bulldogs – WCC Tournament champions

3) Iowa State Cyclones – Big 12 Tournament champions

4) Georgetown Hoyas – At large

5) Utah Utes – At large

6) SMU Mustangs – AAC Tournament champions

7) Iowa Hawkeyes – At large

8) San Diego State Aztecs – At large

9) St John’s Red Storm – At large

10) Davidson Wildcats – At large

11) UCLA Bruins – At large

12) Stephen F Austin Lumberjacks – Southland Tournament champions

13) Eastern Washington Eagles – Big Sky Tournament champions

14) UAB Blazers – Conference USA Tournament champions

15) North Dakota State JackRabbits – Summit Tournament champions

16) North Florida Osprey – Atlantic Sun Tournament champions

http://gty.im/465224318

 

 

Here are how the teams stack up according to the metrics. We will be using offensive and defensive efficiency, as well as three of the four factors: effective field goal percentage (weighs 3s), turnover percentage and offensive rebound percentage.

Offensive Efficiency

  1. 121.9 – Duke 2
  2. 119.4 – Gonzaga 6
  3. 118.9 – Iowa State 7
  4. 118.7 – Davidson 8
  5. 113.1 – Utah 20
  6. 112.9 – Stephen F. Austin 22
  7. 112.3 – SMU 25
  8. 111 – Iowa 36
  9. 110.3 – Georgetown 41
  10. 110.2 – UCLA 43
  11. 109.9 – Eastern Washington 47
  12. 108.1 – St John’s 62
  13. 105.6 – North Florida 98
  14. 103.7 – UAB 132
  15. 102.4 – San Diego State 165
  16. 101 – North Dakota State 194

eFG%

  1. 58.4 – Gonzaga 2
  2. 56.9 – Duke 4
  3. 56.2 – Stephen F. Austin  9
  4. 56 – Davidson 11
  5. 55.6 – Utah 13
  6. 55.4 – Eastern Washington 14
  7. 54.7 – Iowa State 16
  8. 53.6 – North Florida 32
  9. 52.4 – SMU 50
  10. 50.9 – Georgetown 85
  11. 49.4 – UCLA 155
  12. 49.3 – St John’s 159
  13. 49.2 – North Dakota State 167
  14. 47.8 – Iowa 228
  15. 47.8 – UAB 229
  16. 46.7 – San Diego State 271

Turnover %

  1. 14.3 – Davidson 2
  2. 15.7 – St John’s 12
  3. 15.8 – Iowa State 16
  4. 15.9 – North Dakota State 17
  5. 16 – Eastern Washington 19
  6. 16.3 – Gonzaga 31
  7. 16.8 – Duke 45
  8. 17.4 – Iowa 70
  9. 17.5 – UCLA 72
  10. 17.8 – Utah 87
  11. 18 – North Florida 103
  12. 18.6 – San Diego State 136
  13. 19.2 – Georgetown 184
  14. 19.7 – SMU 215
  15. 20.3 – Stephen F. Austin  256
  16. 20.4 – UAB 266

Offensive Rebound %

  1. 37.7 – Stephen F. Austin  13
  2. 37.4 – Duke 16
  3. 37 – SMU 19
  4. 35.9 – San Diego State 31
  5. 35.8 – Iowa 33
  6. 34.3 – Georgetown 70
  7. 34 – UAB 82
  8. 33.9 – Gonzaga 86
  9. 33.8 – UCLA  87
  10. 31.3 – Utah 163
  11. 29.8 – Davidson 215
  12. 29.4 – Eastern Washington 235
  13. 28.9 – North Florida 254
  14. 28.5 – Iowa State 264
  15. 27.8 – St John’s 279
  16. 26.5 – North Dakota State 309

 

Defensive Efficiency

  1. 88.3 – San Diego State 4
  2. 90.6 – Utah 8
  3. 92.5 – Gonzaga 21
  4. 93.7 – Georgetown 25
  5. 95 – SMU 42
  6. 95 – Iowa 43
  7. 95.7 – St John’s 51
  8. 96.2 – Duke 56
  9. 97.4 – UCLA 75
  10. 97.7 – Iowa State 82
  11. 99.3 – Stephen F. Austin  104
  12. 100.1 – North Dakota State 122
  13. 100.3 – UAB 127
  14. 102.8 – North Florida 173
  15. 103.1 – Davidson 181
  16. 107.7 – Eastern Washington 282

eFG %

  1. 42.7 – Utah 5
  2. 42.7 – San Diego State 6
  3. 43.6 – Gonzaga 9
  4. 45.1 – Iowa 31
  5. 45.5 – SMU 41
  6. 46.1 – St John’s 61
  7. 46.6 – Georgetown 71
  8. 47.2 – UAB 95
  9. 47.4 – Duke 98
  10. 47.8 – North Dakota State 113
  11. 47.9 – North Florida 119
  12. 47.9 – Iowa State 121
  13. 48.7 – UCLA 160
  14. 48.8 – Stephen F. Austin 162
  15. 49.1 – Davidson 168
  16. 52 – Eastern Washington 290

Turnover %

  1. 24.3 – Stephen F. Austin 5
  2. 21.5 – San Diego State 38
  3. 20.6 – Georgetown 83
  4. 20 – SMU 118
  5. 19.8 – UAB 130
  6. 19.5 – St John’s 143
  7. 19.3 – Iowa 156
  8. 18.7 – Duke 192
  9. 18.5 – Iowa State 212
  10. 18.5 – UCLA 214
  11. 18.3 – Utah 228
  12. 18.2 – North Florida 230
  13. 17.7 – Eastern Washington 260
  14. 17.6 – Gonzaga 264
  15. 17.3 – Davidson 276
  16. 16.6 – North Dakota State 309

Offensive Rebound %

  1. 23.4 – North Dakota State 2
  2. 28.1 – UCLA 50
  3. 28.1 – Utah 51
  4. 28.6 – Gonzaga 69
  5. 29.2 – Iowa State 85
  6. 29.3 – SMU 92
  7. 29.9 – Stephen F. Austin 116
  8. 30.1 – Duke 122
  9. 30.1 – Davidson 123
  10. 30.2 – San Diego State 125
  11. 30.5 – Iowa 147
  12. 30.6 – Eastern Washington 148
  13. 31.3 – Georgetown 182
  14. 32 – North Florida 226
  15. 33.1 – UAB 267
  16. 35.4 – St John’s 331

http://gty.im/466225906

 

The favorite – Duke Blue Devils

Yes, the computer likes Gonzaga more than Duke but I can’t go along. The Blue Devils do get the actual teams in the region who play defense on their side of the bracket. Duke is also a team full of pros, which you can’t really say about San Diego St or Utah. With how prone all of the teams can be, this region could be up in the air. I’m being boring and rolling with the top squad.

http://gty.im/466252312

 

Upset Some People are Picking – Davidson Over Iowa

There is good reason for this one and that is Davidson is a great offensive team and Iowa can not shoot well. The strength of the Hawkeyes is getting to the foul line, where they are a top 25 team in free throw percentage. Iowa is one of the teams in the region that crash the offensive glass, which is something Davidson needs to lock down if they are going to pull the upset. The Hawkeyes can really struggle from three point range and from two point range. Luckily for them, Davidson is very weak on the interior. Davidson shoots very well and don’t turn the ball over. Those are keys for an upset. Any team a team is great from three, that’s a major advantage.

http://gty.im/466011038

 

Game We Want to See: Gonzaga vs Iowa State

We need these teams to play. We need tons of threes in the air. We need Kyle Wiltjer and Georges Niang trying to top the other. We need Monte Morris being guarded by Gary Bell. We need Pangos. We need Gonzaga to be up 15 in the second half and the rally to start. We may or may not need a Gonzaga player crying on the court like Adam Morrison, but that might be pushing it too much.

http://gty.im/460414702

 

Best Scorer – Tyler Harvey, Eastern Washington

The nation’s leading scorer is the main reason that I would lean Eastern Washington over Georgetown. Of course Harvey gets it done in every way. He hits 52.4% of his two point shots, 40.4% from three point range and 85.4% from the free throw line. He’ll get his against anyone.

http://gty.im/464580776

Best First Round Story: Larry Brown vs UCLA

SMU is a bit of a comfortable favorite against the Bruins. The main story of this is Larry Brown coaching against the program he took to a title game back in the 1980s.

 

Who is most vulernable: Duke, Gonzaga or Iowa State?

http://gty.im/459696040

There are very legitimate cases to make all of them could lose in the second round. Duke could go up against a San Diego State team that is long and tenacious, followed by a Utah team that is great defensively. Back to back body blow games.

Gonzaga would have a tough game against Iowa or Davidson. The Wildcats offense could give Gonzaga fits the same way that BYU did. Iowa has a lot of great talented led by Aaron White.

Iowa State has a potential tough game against SMU waiting in the second round. The Mustangs with Markus Kennedy aren’t the same team that failed every early season test. The key for SMU would be holding on to the ball. SMU has playmakers like Nic Moore that could pull out a close contest.

 

How hard do teams have to try to turn it over in this region?

You can see those turnover rates, good lord. With how good the ball handling appears to be, some teams are going to be in trouble if they are down late. This is not the best region if you like a turnover fest.

http://gty.im/459121578

 

Let’s run down the best players in the South.

Points

  1. 22.9 – Tyler Harvey, Eastern Washington
  2. 18.8 – Lawrence Alexander, North Dakota St
  3. 17.7 – Jahlil Okafor, Duke
  4. 17.4 – D’Angelo Harrison, St John’s
  5. 17 – Tyler Kalinoski, Davidson
  6. 16.7 – Kyle Wiltjer, Gonzaga
  7. 16.6 – Venky Jois, Eastern Washington
  8. 16.4 – Norman Powell, UCLA
  9. 16.3 – Jack Gibbs, Davidson
  10. 16.2 – D’Vauntes Smith-Rivera, Georgetown
  11. 16 – Aaron White, Iowa
  12. 15.9 – Dallas Moore, North Florida
  13. 15.7 – Quinn Cook, Duke
  14. 15.7 – Thomas Walkup, Stephen F Austin
  15. 15.4 – Georges Niang, Iowa State
  16. 15.2 – Rodney Pryor, Robert Morris
  17. 15.1 – Bryce Alford, UCLA
  18. 14.9 – Delon Wright, Utah
  19. 14.8 – Lucky Jones, Robert Morris
  20. 14.3 – Dysheed Jordan, St John’s
  21. 14.3 – Elijah Minnie, Robert Morris
  22. 14.2 – Nic Moore, SMU
  23. 14.1 – Jacob Parker, Stephen F Austin
  24. 13.5 – Sir’Dominic Pointer, St John’s
  25. 13.1 – Phil Greene IV, St John’s
  26. 13.1 – Robert Brown, UAB

Field Goals Made

  1. 239 – Jahlil Okafor, Duke
  2. 221 – Tyler Harvey, Eastern Washington
  3. 214 – Kyle Wiltjer, Gonzaga
  4. 207 – Dallas Moore, North Florida
  5. 202 – Venky Jois, Eastern Washington
  6. 196 – Lawrence Alexander, North Dakota St
  7. 195 – Norman Powell, UCLA
  8. 189 – Tyler Kalinoski, Davidson
  9. 183 – Georges Niang, Iowa State
  10. 183 – Rodney Pryor, Robert Morris
  11. 181 – Thomas Walkup, Stephen F Austin
  12. 179 – Marcquise Reed, Robert Morris
  13. 172 – Quinn Cook, Duke
  14. 171 – D’Angelo Harrison, St John’s
  15. 166 – Sir’Dominic Pointer, St John’s

Free Throws Made

    1. 189 – Aaron White, Iowa
    2. 152 – D’Angelo Harrison, St John’s
    3. 147 – Tyler Harvey, Eastern Washington
    4. 144 – Thomas Walkup, Stephen F Austin
    5. 136 – Delon Wright, Utah
    6. 132 – Jalen Nesbitt, North Florida
    7. 127 – D’Vauntes Smith-Rivera, Georgetown
    8. 122 – Tyus Jones, Duke
    9. 115 – Norman Powell, UCLA
    10. 112 – Bryce Alford, UCLA
    11. 111 – Lawrence Alexander, North Dakota St
    12. 108 – Rysheed Jordan, St John’s
    13. 104 – Lucky Jones, Robert Morris
    14. 103 – Jacob Parker, Stephen F Austin
    15. 100 – Nic Moore, SMU

 

Free Throw % – min 40 attempts

  1. 88.5 – Nic Moore, SMU
  2. 88.4 – Tyus Jones, Duke
  3. 88.3 – Kevin Pangos, Gonzaga
  4. 87.6 – D’Vauntes Smith-Rivera, Georgetown
  5. 87.5 – Brandon Taylor, Utah
  6. 86.4 – Trent Mackey, North Florida
  7. 86.3 – Jordan Loveridge, Utah
  8. 85.3 – Jack Gibbs, Davidson
  9. 85 – Tyler Harvey, Eastern Washington
  10. 84.8 – Nick Norton, UAB
  11. 84.2 – Bryce Alford, UCLA
  12. 83.7 – Jacob Parker, Stephen F Austin
  13. 83.4 – Delon Wright, Utah
  14. 82.6 – Jared Johnson, Stephen F Austin
  15. 82 – AJ Jacobson, North Dakota St

3 Pointers Made

  1. 122 – Tyler Harvey, Eastern Washington
  2. 100 – Lawerence Alexander, North Dakota St
  3. 91 – Quinn Cook, Duke
  4. 91 – Tyler Kalinoski, Davidson
  5. 83 – Beau Beech, North Florida
  6. 81 – Brian Sullivan, Davidson
  7. 80 – Trent Mackey, North Florida
  8. 79 – Bryce Alford, UCLA
  9. 76 – Rodney Pryor, Robert Morris
  10. 75 – Naz Long, Iowa State
  11. 75 – Brandon Taylor, Utah
  12. 72 – Kevin Pangos, Gonzaga
  13. 71 – Nic Moore, SMU
  14. 68 – D’Vauntes Smith-Rivera, Georgetown
  15. 65 – D’Angelo Harrison, St John’s

3 Point % – min 40 attempts

    1. 56.1 – Bogdan Bliznyuk, Eastern Washington
    2. 47.5 – William Lee, UAB
    3. 47 – Jacob Parker, Stephen F Austin
    4. 46.6 – Kyle Wiltjer, Gonzaga
    5. 46.5 – Sterling Brown, SMU
    6. 46.3 – Brekkot Chapman, Utah
    7. 45.8 – Kevon Looney, UCLA
    8. 44.4 – Kevin Pangos, Gonzaga
    9. 44.1 – Jack Gibbs, Davidson
    10. 44.1 – Parker Kelly, Eastern Washington
    11. 44.1 – Lawrence Alexander, North Dakota St
    12. 44 – Elijah Minnie, Robert Morris
    13. 44 – Trent Mackey, North Florida
    14. 43.9 – Brandon Taylor, Utah
    15. 43.8 – Dustin Hogue, Iowa State
    16. 43.8 – Jordan Loveridge, Utah

Rebounds

  1. 302 – Kevon Looney, UCLA
  2. 288 – Jahlil Okafor, Duke
  3. 243 – Sir’Dominic Pointer, St John’s
  4. 241 – Aaron White, Iowa
  5. 236 – Domantas Sabonis, Gonzaga
  6. 234 – Drew Brandon, Eastern Washington
  7. 230 – Venky Jois, Eastern Washington
  8. 215 – Chris Davenport, North Florida
  9. 213  – Jakob Poeltl, Utah
  10. 211 – Yanick Moreira, SMU
  11. 211 – Thomas Walkup, Stephen F Austin
  12. 209 – Chris Obekpa, St John’s
  13. 205 – Kyle Wiltjer, Gonzaga
  14. 204 – Tony Parker, UCLA
  15. 200 – Jarrod Uthoff, Iowa

Offensive Rebounds

    1. 125 – Jahlil Okafor, Duke
    2. 111 – Kevon Looney, UCLA
    3. 83 – Jakob Poeltl, Utah
    4. 82 – Tony Parker, UCLA
    5. 81 – Joshua Smith, Georgetown
    6. 80 – Amile Jefferson Duke
    7. 79 – Yanick Moreira, SMU
    8. 79 – Thomas Walkup, Stephen F Austin
    9. 79 – Venky Jois, Eastern Washington
    10. 73 – Mikael Hopkins, Georgetown
    11. 72 – Gabriel Olaseni, Iowa
    12. 72 – Chris Obekpa, St John’s
    13. 71  – Domantas Sabonis, Gonzaga
    14. 71 – JJ O’Brien, San Diego St
    15. 69 – Aaron White, Iowa

Assists

  1. 190 – Tyus Jones, Duke
  2. 172 – Monte Morris, Iowa State
  3. 172 – Nic Moore, SMU
  4. 170 – Kevin Pangos, Gonzaga
  5. 169 – Delon Wright, Utah
  6. 166 – Bryce Alford, UCLA
  7. 159 – Drew Brandon, Eastern Washington
  8. 144 – Kavon Stewart, Robert Morris
  9. 130 – Nick Norton, UAB
  10. 128 – Tyler Kalinoski, Davidson
  11. 128 – Trey Pinkney, Stephen F Austin
  12. 124 – Mike Gesell, Iowa
  13. 123 – Dallas Moore, North Florida
  14. 121 – Thomas Walkup, Stephen F Austin
  15. 120 – Brian Sullivan, Davidson

Turnovers

    1. 91 – Rysheed Jordan, St John’s
    2. 88 – Georges Niang, Iowa State
    3. 87 – Marcquise Reed, Robert Morris
    4. 85 – Nic Moore, SMU
    5. 83 – Bryce Alford, UCLA
    6. 82 – Jahlil Okafor, Duke
    7. 82 – Kavon Stewart, Robert Morris
    8. 82  – Jalen Nesbitt, North Florida
    9. 81 – Winston Shepard, San Diego St
    10. 77 – Isaac Hamilton, UCLA
    11. 77 – Dallas Moore, North Florida
    12. 72 – Robert Brown, UAB
    13. 72 – Lucky Jones, Robert Morris
    14. 72 – Chris Davenport, North Florida
    15. 70 – Norman Powell, UCLA

Steals

    1. 66 – Delon Wright, Utah
    2. 64 – Norman Powell, UCLA
    3. 62 – Marcquise Reed, Robert Morris
    4. 61 – Sir’Dominic Pointer, St John’s
    5. 60 – Monte Morris, Iowa State
    6. 59 – Drew Brandon, Eastern Washington
    7. 57 – Jalen Nesbitt, North Florida
    8. 54 – Kavon Stewart, Robert Morris
    9. 51 – Rysheed Jordan, St John’s
    10. 49 – Tyus Jones, Duke
    11. 49 – JJ O’Brien, San Diego St
    12. 48 – D’Vauntes Smith-Rivera, Georgetown
    13. 46 – Nick Norton, UAB
    14. 45 – Kevin Pangos, Gonzaga
    15. 45 – Trey Pinkney, Stephen F. Austin

Blocks

  1. 94 – Chris Obekpa, St John’s
  2. 85 – Skylar Spencer, San Diego St
  3. 78 – Sir’Dominic Pointer, St John’s
  4. 67 – Venky Jois, Eastern Washington
  5. 64 – Tosin Mehinti, UAB
  6. 54 – Jakob Poeltl, Utah
  7. 54 – Jarrod Uthoff, Iowa
  8. 53 – Jameel McKay, Iowa State
  9. 53 – Demarcus Daniels, North Florida
  10. 50 – Gabriel Olaseni, Iowa
  11. 49 – Mikael Hopkins, Georgetown
  12. 49 – Tanner Clayton, Stephen F. Austin
  13. 48 – William Lee, UAB
  14. 45 – Chris Kading, North Dakota St
  15. 44 – Jahlil Okafor, Duke

About Scott

I write Bearcats Blog and also on the Student Section.

Quantcast